Archive
Category: Science and religion
Why the argument between science, religion, and philosophy has lasted centuries without resolving, and what a third position looks like from where Martinus stood.
-
Why do science and religion contradict each other?
These are not stupid people arguing in bad faith. They have been at it for centuries. Martinus’ diagnosis is that the disagreement is structural,…
-
The scientific belief that makes you believe in death
Science says that when you die, you stop. That is not a discovery — it is an assumption, and Martinus mapped it as a…
-
Why spiritual answers never quite hold together
People who go looking for answers usually end up with a pile of them, and none of them fit together. The video asks why…
-
Why is atheism growing so fast?
Atheism is treated here as a developmental stage rather than a position to be refuted — the predictable result of one faculty growing while…
-
Will religion fade away — and what are the actual alternatives?
Follows the decline of religion past the diagnosis and into the harder question: if it does fade, what takes its place — and is…
-
Materialism — are we missing something?
Science answers “how” extremely well. The question is whether “why” is a question with no answer, or a question that instrument was never built…
-
What is spiritual science? Four things it would have to satisfy
“Spiritual science” sounds either impressive or contradictory depending on your mood. This video does the useful thing and sets out what would actually have…
-
Why is religion declining? Intelligence and belief are different abilities
Churches are emptying, and the usual explanations blame the churches. This one blames nothing — it says the faculty religion was built to run…
-
What is materialism, and what is it for?
The interesting question about materialism is not whether it is correct. It is why a stage that excludes so much would exist at all…
-
Absolute and relative truth — and why the difference matters outside philosophy
Two kinds of truth, distinguished by where the analysis starts from. Both are necessary — and confusing them is what makes so many arguments…